posted by
sigelphoenix at 09:34pm on 08/07/2010 under anti-racism and racial privilege, cooking and food, general geekery
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I've gotten to the point where I haven't posted anything in so long that I feel like what I do end up posting ought to be significant in proportion to the amount of time I haven't blogged. But then I feel intimidated, so I don't write, so I feel like my next post should be even more significant, and so on.
So I'm just going to write down one-paragraph thoughts, rather than sitting around and hoping they grow into full-fledged posts.
I've dipped my toe into the world of CSAs with
ratzeo,
lunapome, and
music_enforcer. The four of us split a box intended for a family of four (and thus, presumably, some children and not all adults) so that we don't get overwhelmed by produce. And the farm we subscribe to isn't precisely a CSA, so we're "cheating" that way too. But I start new things slowly, and this has been really working out so far. Though I should note that I haven't been necessarily eating healthier, since the most appealing recipes I find for using all this fresh produce often involves things like cheese and pancetta ... On the plus side, I've discovered that I love kale, and that stuff is effin' good for you.
I've found that I like it when the naive, idealistically helpful character gets disillusioned. Not because I want to see them suffer, but because often the naive, idealistically helpful character gets tons of credit for being good and sweet, while more cynical characters are seen as "too angry" - and even if the characters aren't explicitly of a privileged and non-privileged group, it reminds me strongly of the dynamic of "good, productive man/white person/able-bodied person/etc." versus "angry, bitter woman/POC/disabled person/etc." Sure, the person who wants to help ought to be given credit for wanting to help, but the person who is justifiably angry because they have to actually live with the hardship, and who knows why the "helper's" good will often ends up being more intent than results, is where my sympathy lies. For example, one thing I liked about the "Painted Lady" episode of Avatar was that Katara had to learn that her desire to help the town had to be accompanied by an actual understanding of the power structures facing that town before she could do any substantial, lasting good.
Speaking of Avatar ... Make no mistake, I think M. Night Shyamalan has been an asshat and I'm maliciously pleased that The Last Airbender is getting lambasted. However, I do feel a certain amount of protectiveness when protesters (more often fans who are new to anti-racism than vice versa) target Shyamalan as the source of the casting injustice. Regardless of how much control Shyamalan did or did not have over the casting, he's just a cog in the machine of Hollywood's institutionalized racism, and pinning the blame on the brown guy while the white producers escape any culpability does nothing for anti-racism. Also? Expressing your disdain for Shyamalan by making fun of his obviously Indian name ("Shyamalamadingdong" and other charming variations) means you're being racist too, goddammit.
So I'm just going to write down one-paragraph thoughts, rather than sitting around and hoping they grow into full-fledged posts.
I've dipped my toe into the world of CSAs with
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I've found that I like it when the naive, idealistically helpful character gets disillusioned. Not because I want to see them suffer, but because often the naive, idealistically helpful character gets tons of credit for being good and sweet, while more cynical characters are seen as "too angry" - and even if the characters aren't explicitly of a privileged and non-privileged group, it reminds me strongly of the dynamic of "good, productive man/white person/able-bodied person/etc." versus "angry, bitter woman/POC/disabled person/etc." Sure, the person who wants to help ought to be given credit for wanting to help, but the person who is justifiably angry because they have to actually live with the hardship, and who knows why the "helper's" good will often ends up being more intent than results, is where my sympathy lies. For example, one thing I liked about the "Painted Lady" episode of Avatar was that Katara had to learn that her desire to help the town had to be accompanied by an actual understanding of the power structures facing that town before she could do any substantial, lasting good.
Speaking of Avatar ... Make no mistake, I think M. Night Shyamalan has been an asshat and I'm maliciously pleased that The Last Airbender is getting lambasted. However, I do feel a certain amount of protectiveness when protesters (more often fans who are new to anti-racism than vice versa) target Shyamalan as the source of the casting injustice. Regardless of how much control Shyamalan did or did not have over the casting, he's just a cog in the machine of Hollywood's institutionalized racism, and pinning the blame on the brown guy while the white producers escape any culpability does nothing for anti-racism. Also? Expressing your disdain for Shyamalan by making fun of his obviously Indian name ("Shyamalamadingdong" and other charming variations) means you're being racist too, goddammit.
(no subject)
Saw this post on my network, but I had to comment on this bit: THANK YOU. Fine, if you can't spell it but at least try and guess (or better yet, use the internet to check!) but don't call him "Shyamalamadingdong" while calling him out for the racist casting.
I don't think I've seen any white director that has had his name mocked like that. :\
And also, thank you for pointing out that it's a Hollywood issue. Shyamalan is to blame for having a say and choosing to support the racism inherit in the system, but he did not bring it into the system from nowhere.
(no subject)
It's obnoxious enough when people do this for the names of things they don't like, it's insulting enough when they do it to a person's name (speaking from experience), but it's downright inexcusable when done to a person's name because it's "foreign." >:(
(no subject)
(Alas, I do not have the icon slots on DW for all the icons I want.)
(no subject)
And please tell me directly if I ever make your side look bad. >_>;;
Like if I'm being a bad ally in this thread, for example. O_o
(I honestly don't always know if I'm being helpful or detrimental in my attempts, so always feel free to tell me to STFU.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
I agree, even if/when white directors are mocked, the effect isn't the same, because the "humor" of making fun of Shyamalan's name is rooted in its "foreignness."
I'm definitely not the only one trying to emphasize the systemic nature of the problem, but the more of us who say it, the better. There's too much language being used that implies that Shyamalan is the creator of the problem, rather than merely being complicit; but even if he's as racist and self-hating as some people say, self-hating POC have no power to perpetuate racism without the white power structure backing them up.
(no subject)
(no subject)
I like your blanching technique and will have to try that next time. Since kale is so tough, do you blanch it for longer than other leafy greens?
Also I assume you have tried kale chips? I didn't love them as much as I thought I would, but it is a good way to use up excess kale.
(no subject)
(no subject)
...at some point we should figure out when we all have free time/social energy the same weekend, for serious, and actually see each other in person. ♥
In less awesome --
"Shyamalamadingdong" and other charming variations
D: D: D:
PEOPLE WHY DO YOU FAIL SO MUCH
(no subject)
(no subject)
The weekend of the 24th-ish we are out of town, but the one before that or the one after that we could do stuff! We should make a plan.
...possibly in email, I guess. ^^;