Read book 92. Jonathan Livingston Seagull, by Richard Bach, 1970, a fable, as the characters are literally seagulls, about how the Flock are inspired by joining an obsessive flying-and-starving cult that it would be insulting all round to describe as Buddhism-lite-for-libertarian-Christians. It gave me the feeling of a late 60s hippy cult trying to manifest, and very much Of Its Time as it was written 1967 ish (at last, a realistic use for the phrase "of its time"). Not my thing / out of five, but I can understand why some people find it interesting or useful in the same way people can find inspiration in bland self-help platitudes or undemanding mass-market spirituality, because the inspiration is contributed by the reader (or their Genius / Juno / whatever).
However, remember that the unexamined life is definitely worth living: look at dogs! Be honest, reincarnation as a domestic dog or a wild seagull? Dogs, innit.
However, remember that the unexamined life is definitely worth living: look at dogs! Be honest, reincarnation as a domestic dog or a wild seagull? Dogs, innit.
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 12
If binary choice reincarnation was compulsory?
View Answers
Wild seagull (Larus unspecifica)
2 (18.2%)
Domestic dog (Canis familiaris)
5 (45.5%)
Nope, not even for a humorous poll
4 (36.4%)
Abominations unto Nuggan?
View Answers
Seagulls!
1 (8.3%)
Lumping gull species together as "seagulls".
10 (83.3%)
Seagull-proofed bins. /typing with talons
2 (16.7%)
All sneaky chip thieves, actually.
4 (33.3%)
(Not dogs because even Nuggan would never!)
3 (25.0%)
There are no comments on this entry. (Reply.)