sigelphoenix: (anti-oppression is not always palatable)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] sigelphoenix at 08:33am on 08/02/2011 under ,
For those who do not watch the Super Bowl, or have not otherwise heard, the deal website Groupon ran a swimming-in-privilege commercial exploiting Tibet. Angry Asian Man includes the form letter they're sending out as a fauxpology to anyone who complains.

I sent my own email to complain and ask for my account to be deleted, and here is the version they sent me:

Thanks for your email.

We certainly don't mean to offend with our advertisements.

I see you've been able to read our CEO's response (http://www.groupon.com/blog/), and I'm sorry you still feel offended. We have moved to action by raising awareness to worthy causes.

We are very informed on each of these issues, and have received some amazing responses from Tibetan Americans, Greenpeace, and others who appreciated us shedding light in places that remain dark to the average consumer.


Wow, what a persuasive response! You're well-informed, really! You have friends who are ______, and they say it's okay! And you're still not sorry. Would you like a Dickwolves shirt with that order of willful ignorance, sir?

I'm going to give it one more shot and explain why none of those things makes up for the lack of apology and action, for what it's worth. I'm sure a lone voice won't change their minds, but hopefully right now they're receiving a loud and un-ignorable chorus that I can add to.

ETA: my response

Please do go ahead and delete my account. I understand that Groupon is also raising money for causes referenced in their commercials. The reason that is not enough for me is that the commercials themselves do not reference any fundraising. They are just about getting a cheap laugh out of the idea that you can ignore other people's hardships in favor of buying something for yourself - at least, you can laugh if you are white, wealthy, from the U.S., and can mentally distance yourself from those people. Even if Groupon also gives money to those causes, you are still talking out the other side of your mouth and using Tibet as the butt of your joke. The donations are good, but they don't negate the latter. Also, for people who just see the commercials but don't look into Groupon's philanthropy, the *only* message they get is that cheap laugh, and that is actually harmful.

I would be interested in renewing my account with Groupon if the company apologized, because it seems like you meant well but completely flubbed it. However, it would have to be an actual apology, not just some "we didn't mean to offend" dodging, as well as some sort of action - taking down the commercials at the very least, and running ads that explicitly solicit support for the causes. I know I am just one customer, and a new one at that, but I am sure I am not the only one who feels this way, and hopefully not the only one saying this to you. I hope you do the decent thing and admit that you did wrong.
There are 7 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
mimerki: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] mimerki at 05:35pm on 08/02/2011
WTF? Leaving aside the race issues, I'm not sure what the faux-philanthropy theme is supposed to get them. (I know, it's hard to leave aside the race issues and I don't mean to minimize them.) "So, I can save money *and* feel like a privileged asshole? Sign me up!"

What's next?
"It's a bloody shame so many local library systems can't pass levies to get much needed funds, but you could save some money at Borders!"
"We all feel horrible that there are perfectly nice (white) kids growing up in poverty. How about a trip to the amusement park?"
"African-Americans have had a rough time of it. Soul food is delicious!"
"Loisa supports most of her extended family in an unnamed South or Central American country by cleaning the houses of middle class white people in the US. Why don't you pay her even less?"
sigelphoenix: (anti-oppression is not always palatable)
posted by [personal profile] sigelphoenix at 05:59pm on 08/02/2011
I get what you're saying - usually when people fuck up like this, they're trying to go for something else, something funny or genius or whatever, and just totally step in something they didn't mean to. Here, it's like they are purposefully being dismissive of other people's hardship ... for the sake of being dismissive of other people's hardship?

The only idea I have is that it's some form of hipster racism, because they're being just a touch more offensive than is usually allowed in polite company, but oh, they're so cheeky about it, ha ha. And it makes for a memorable Super Bowl commercial, hooray. *eyeroll*
mimerki: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] mimerki at 06:46pm on 08/02/2011
Exactly. It doesn't feel like it's supposed to be funny or clever or even shocking. It just feels thoughtlessly middle-class, like people who just don't understand why it's hard to stop being poor.
sigelphoenix: (anti-oppression is not always palatable)
posted by [personal profile] sigelphoenix at 07:50pm on 08/02/2011
But they'll still donate, see, because they're such kind souls. They just don't actually give the people/causes they're helping actual respect. My favorite kind of donor.
 
posted by [personal profile] ex_troublesteady667 at 07:20pm on 08/02/2011
So I watched that advert. Then I screamed. Then I read the Angry Asian Man article and screamed some more. By the time I got to their response to you, I only really had furious wheezing left.

I think the thing that upsets me most about any of this it that this thing was greenlit. It was filmed. Edited. Probably hundreds of people took part in making that bloody thing. And no one said, Uh, guys, is it just me, or does something about it feel a bit ... wrong?

Scream.
sigelphoenix: (anti-oppression is not always palatable)
posted by [personal profile] sigelphoenix at 08:01pm on 08/02/2011
Yeah, I'm sure (because I will lose all faith in humanity otherwise) that there were people who felt that this was a bad idea, but clearly no one who was willing to speak up about it. Because when you think of the people of Tibet or endangered whales as distant and not real, just objects for your charity (and humor, of course), it's very easy to justify your comfort/job security/social standing as being more important.
ratzeo: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] ratzeo at 11:10pm on 08/02/2011
What's currently driving me mad is that they can't even apologize. The best anyone is getting is a "Sorry you were offended."

If they're getting enough backlash to know that they've done something wrong, what would it cost them to make a real apology?

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
    1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14 15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31