sigelphoenix: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] sigelphoenix at 12:59pm on 05/02/2006 under

BLUE
BLUES are motivated by INTIMACY, seek opportunities
to genuinely connect with others, and need to
be appreciated. They do everything with
quality and are devoted and loyal friends and
employers/employees. Whatever or whomever
they commit to are their sole (and soul)
focus. They love to serve and will give
freely of themselves in order to nurture
others lives.

BLUES, however, do need to be understood. They have
distinct preferences and occasionally the
somewhat controlling (but always fair)
personality of a confident leader. Their code
of ethics is remarkably strong and they
expect others to live honest, committed lives
as well. They enjoy sharing meaningful
moments in conversation as well as
remembering special life events (i.e.,
birthdays and anniversaries). BLUES are
dependable, thoughtful, nurturing, and can
also be self-righteous, a bit worry-prone,
and emotionally intense. They are like
sainted pit-bulls who never let go of
something once they are committed. When you
deal with a BLUE, be sincere, make an effort
to truly understand them, and truly
appreciate them.


What Color Are You?
brought to you by Quizilla
sigelphoenix: (Default)
Thoughts are coalescing in my head, and I figure it's better to spit them all out now than let them nag at me when I'm trying to do homework ...

Back when I first started following [insanejournal.com profile] feminist, I remember thinking that I wished it was more debate-friendly, or that I could find a community for debating aspects of feminism. ([insanejournal.com profile] anti_feminism was, unfortunately, the only thing I found, and I've peeked in on it from time to time to see if it would disprove my view of it as a crock of bullshit. It hasn't.) Sure, there's disagreement on [insanejournal.com profile] feminist, but often sharply dissenting views will spark hostile reactions, so debate gets stifled. I wanted a place where the atmosphere was more conducive to "civilized debate," like [insanejournal.com profile] abortiondebate, which I've been following for years. Besides some ground rules about no personal attacks and the like, everything is pretty much free game. Vehemently pro-choice and vehemently pro-life people engage in open conversation with (theoretically) a basic level of respect.

I've seen recently how this whole "we can debate and just be nice to each other" view is a bit naive. I mean, feminism and abortion are two issues which can stir up a huge amount of passion -- and, resultantly, massive flamewars. Maybe you can't have "civilized debate." But if you do try to put up some rules and have polite conversation, well ... is it really worth it?

In which I argue about how to argue )

Oh, and for feminist debate, there's now [insanejournal.com profile] discussfeminism -- it's relatively new, but it looks promising.

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
    1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14 15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31