posted by
sigelphoenix at 04:32pm on 04/11/2005 under anti-oppression and the evil *isms
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
*puts on pedantic hat*
The concept of "invisibility" is one that's come up in my studies of both feminism and racism. It's really something that happens in all "-ism"s, whenever there's a privileged group and an oppressed minority. But it's kind of a hard thing to explain sometimes, especially because (for me, at least) it's something that's easily overlooked. But that's makes sense if it's called "invisibility," huh? :P
Here is an ad that illustrates the idea perfectly. It's in French, but you don't need to understand the words. I saw it linked on
feminist and just love-love-loved it.
I won't say what the ad is, because it works so beautifully on its own. But it just explains invisibility so well -- it's the ability to assume you're normal, to be the default, to *not* have to put forth extra effort just to do normal, everyday things. It is a *huge* privilege, but since by design it isn't meant to be noticed, most people in privileged groups don't even understand that they have it.
That's why it galls me when I hear straight people complaining that the concept of domestic partnerships gives non-heterosexuals special rights. Or men complaining that Women's Studies is giving women special consideration. Or white people complaining about the consideration of racial minority status as a benefit in selection processes. Or anyone who whines about "special treatment" of minorities. None of this would even be necessary if the default for society weren't straight, rich, white, able-bodied (possibly Christian) male. These unusual treatments stand out only because the default identity doesn't *need* attention -- it just *is.* That's how it's "invisible."
I know I can't explain it as well as I'd like. Please please please watch the video -- it's only a few seconds long, and it's really worthwhile.
The concept of "invisibility" is one that's come up in my studies of both feminism and racism. It's really something that happens in all "-ism"s, whenever there's a privileged group and an oppressed minority. But it's kind of a hard thing to explain sometimes, especially because (for me, at least) it's something that's easily overlooked. But that's makes sense if it's called "invisibility," huh? :P
Here is an ad that illustrates the idea perfectly. It's in French, but you don't need to understand the words. I saw it linked on
![[insanejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/ij-userinfo.gif)
I won't say what the ad is, because it works so beautifully on its own. But it just explains invisibility so well -- it's the ability to assume you're normal, to be the default, to *not* have to put forth extra effort just to do normal, everyday things. It is a *huge* privilege, but since by design it isn't meant to be noticed, most people in privileged groups don't even understand that they have it.
That's why it galls me when I hear straight people complaining that the concept of domestic partnerships gives non-heterosexuals special rights. Or men complaining that Women's Studies is giving women special consideration. Or white people complaining about the consideration of racial minority status as a benefit in selection processes. Or anyone who whines about "special treatment" of minorities. None of this would even be necessary if the default for society weren't straight, rich, white, able-bodied (possibly Christian) male. These unusual treatments stand out only because the default identity doesn't *need* attention -- it just *is.* That's how it's "invisible."
I know I can't explain it as well as I'd like. Please please please watch the video -- it's only a few seconds long, and it's really worthwhile.
There are no comments on this entry. (Reply.)